Comparative analysis of technical indicators of explotative in the cane harvesters KTP-2M and KTP-3000S
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The processes of design, manufacture and operation of agricultural machinery are closely related to increased levels of productivity, fuel consumption and improving cane crops. This research aims to make a comparative analysis of the exploitative technical indicators cane harvesters KTP-2M and KTP-3000S. In the analysis it was demonstrated that the performance of the KTP-3000S harvester exceeds the KTP 2M, achieving significant values in terms of time, field efficiency, coefficient of technical safety, foreign matter field during cutting and values of total production not having this same behavior with fuel consumption indicators and values of crop losses throughout the period. So we can say that the KTP-3000S sugar cane harvester, presented a better performance during the fulfillment of its service destiny.
Article Details
The Universidad Politécnica Salesiana of Ecuador preserves the copyrights of the published works and will favor the reuse of the works. The works are published in the electronic edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Attribution/Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 Ecuador license: they can be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly displayed.
The undersigned author partially transfers the copyrights of this work to the Universidad Politécnica Salesiana of Ecuador for printed editions.
It is also stated that they have respected the ethical principles of research and are free from any conflict of interest. The author(s) certify that this work has not been published, nor is it under consideration for publication in any other journal or editorial work.
The author (s) are responsible for their content and have contributed to the conception, design and completion of the work, analysis and interpretation of data, and to have participated in the writing of the text and its revisions, as well as in the approval of the version which is finally referred to as an attachment.
References
[2] Lebeque, Fernando. “Programa y metodología para la realización de las evaluaciones agrotécnicas a las cosechadoras cañeras KTP-3”. CEDEMA. 2011.
[3] Lebeque, Fernando. “Programa y metodología para la realización de las pruebas al corta cogollo instalado en las cosechadoras cañeras KTP - 2 M”. Holguín. CEDEMA. 1996.
[4] Lebeque, Fernando. y Guethón R. “Programa y metodología para la realización de las pruebas a los elementos de corte”. Holguín. CEDEMA. 2015.
[5] Lebeque, Fernando. y Guethón R. “Programa y metodología para la realización de las pruebas a los segmentos de corte inferior instalados en las cosechadoras cañeras KTP-2M”. Holguín. CEDEMA. 2013.
[6] Lebeque, Fernando. y Guethón R. “Metodología para la determinación de los parámetros cinemáticos de las cosechadoras cañeras KTP-3S”. Holguín. CEDEMA. 2010.
[7] Lebeque, Fernando y Pino J. “Las evaluaciones a las cosechadoras cañeras”. Revista Mecanización y Desarrollo Cuba.3 (2); 34-38. 2014.
[8] Zaldívar, M. y Pupo H. “Determinación de los índices técnico-explotativos y de productividad de la cosechadora de caña KTP-2 en el CAI Fernando de Dios”. Mayo-Agosto 2006. Revista Construcción de Maquinaria. Las Villas, Cuba.
[9] Zaldívar, Mario. “Cuestiones referentes a la necesidad real en la nomenclatura de piezas de repuestos para las cosechadoras de caña KTP”. Artículo publicado en la revista de Rostov del Don. Moscú. Serie monotemática. 2007.
[10] Pupo; H “Necesidad de la evaluación a las máquinas agrícolas” 2004. Revista Construcción de Maquinaria. Las Villas, Cuba.